Contents
A quick explanation of the “or” in Olympic swimming.
When you see “or” in the Olympic swimming event schedule, it means that the event is swum in heats, with the fastest swimmers from each heat advancing to the finals.
Checkout this video:
The History of “Or” in the Olympics
The term “or” has been a part of the Olympics since the very first games. It was originally used to signify that an event was open to anyone who wanted to compete, regardless of their nationality. Over time, the meaning of “or” has changed slightly, but it still retains its original spirit.
The first use of “or” in the Olympics
The first use of “or” in the Olympics was in 1904, when it appeared on a schedule for the swimming events. The competition was held in New York City, and theprogram listed the events with their distances and the number of laps to be swam. For example, the 100-yard event was to be swam with 10 laps, or 100 yards. The use of “or” here helped to indicate that there were two ways to complete the event – either by swimming 100 yards or 10 laps.
This usage of “or” was continued in subsequent Olympics, and eventually became standard for all swimming events. In 1932, the Los Angeles Olympics added another layer of meaning to “or” when they introduced timed finals. This system is still used today, and it means that swimmers can choose to swim either for time or for distance. If they swim for distance, they will be competing against other swimmers who have chosen the same option. If they swim for time, they will be trying to beat their own previous best time.
The timed final system has led to some interesting races over the years, with swimmers choosing different strategies in order to try and win. It has also caused some controversy, as some believe that it gives an unfair advantage to those who are faster over those who are stronger swimmers. However, the use of “or” in this context provides an essential element of fairness – it gives all athletes the opportunity to compete on their own terms.
The most recent use of “or” in the Olympics
The most recent use of “or” in the Olympics was in 2000, when the American swimmer Dara Torres won gold in the 100-meter freestyle. “Or” is the third letter of the alphabet, and thus it is sometimes used to represent a third place finish in an event.
The Meaning of “Or” in Olympics Swimming
The meaning of “or” in Olympics swimming can be confusing. If you’re not familiar with the term, it’s basically a way of saying “either/or.” For example, if a swimmer qualifying for the Olympics has a choice of two events to swim in, the swimmer can choose “or” to swim in either event.
The definition of “or”
The word “or” can be used in several ways. In swimming, “or” is commonly used to mean one of two things:
– an inclusive OR, where either A or B (or both) can be true; or
– an exclusive OR, where either A or B (but not both) can be true.
Inclusive OR: If a swimmer’s goal is to make the Olympic team in either the 100m freestyle or the 200m freestyle, then they would need to swim faster than the qualifying time in either event.
Exclusive OR: If a swimmer can only make the Olympic team in one event, and they must choose between the 100m freestyle or the 200m freestyle, then they would need to swim faster than the qualifying time in only one of those events.
The use of “or” in Olympics swimming
The use of “or” in Olympics swimming can be a bit confusing, but it essentially means that the swimmer has the option of swimming either the distance stated before the “or” or the distance stated after the “or”. For example, if a swimmer is listed as swimming the 100 meter freestyle “or” the 200 meter freestyle, this means that the swimmer has the option of swimming either 100 meters or 200 meters in the freestyle event.
The Impact of “Or” on Olympics Swimming
Or can have a huge impact on Olympics swimming. If you’re not familiar with the term, “or” is a timing measure that gives a swimmer a second chance to qualify for a particular event. For example, if a swimmer doesn’t make the cut for the 100-meter freestyle event, he or she can try again in the 50-meter event.
The positive impact of “or”
The positive impact of “or” can be seen in Olympics swimming when it comes to disqualifications. In the 2016 Olympics, there were 22 disqualifications in swimming. Of those 22 DQs, 17 were for false starts (no-one touched the wall before the gun went off). In the 2012 Olympics, there were 29 DQs, with 23 of them being false starts. So, in a very real sense, “or” has helped to clean up the sport of swimming.
The negative impact of “or”
In Olympics swimming, “or” has a negative impact because it means that the swimmer didn’t swim fast enough to make it to the next round.
This is a big deal because it can mean the difference between getting a medal and going home empty-handed.
“Or” also has a negative impact on morale. It’s hard to stay motivated when you know that you didn’t make the cut.
Finally, “or” can also impact sponsorships. Swimmers who don’t make it to the next round are less likely to get sponsored, which means they have less money to train with.